< Back to 68k.news US front page

Temporal dynamics of the multi-omic response to endurance exercise training

Original source (on modern site)

Main

Regular exercise provides wide-ranging health benefits, including reduced risks of all-cause mortality1,5, cardiometabolic and neurological diseases, cancer and other pathologies2,6,7. Exercise affects nearly all organ systems in either improving health or reducing disease risk2,3,6,7, with beneficial effects resulting from cellular and molecular adaptations within and across many tissues and organ systems3. Various 'omic' platforms ('omes') including transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics and metabolomics, have been used to study these events. However, work to date typically covers one or two omes at a single time point, is biased towards one sex, and often focuses on a single tissue, most often skeletal muscle, heart or blood8,9,10,11,12, with few studies considering other tissues13. Accordingly, a comprehensive, organism-wide, multi-omic map of the effects of exercise is needed to understand the molecular underpinnings of exercise training-induced adaptations. To address this need, the Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) was established with the goal of building a molecular map of the exercise response across a broad range of tissues in animal models and in skeletal muscle, adipose and blood in humans4. Here we present the first whole-organism molecular map of the temporal effects of endurance exercise training in male and female rats and provide multiple insights enabled by this MoTrPAC multi-omic data resource.

Multi-omic analysis of exercise training

Six-month-old male and female Fischer 344 rats were subjected to progressive treadmill endurance exercise training (hereafter referred to as endurance training) for 1, 2, 4 or 8 weeks, with tissues collected 48 h after the last exercise bout (Fig. 1a). Sex-matched sedentary, untrained rats were used as controls. Training resulted in robust phenotypic changes (Extended Data Fig. 1a-d), including increased aerobic capacity (VO2 max) by 18% and 16% at 8 weeks in males and females, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 1a). The percentage of body fat decreased by 5% in males at 8 weeks (Extended Data Fig. 1b), without a significant change in lean mass (Extended Data Fig. 1c). In females, the body fat percentage did not change after 4 or 8 weeks of training, whereas it increased by 4% in sedentary controls (Extended Data Fig. 1b). Body weight of females increased in all intervention groups, with no change for males (Extended Data Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1: Summary of the study design and multi-omics dataset.

a, Experimental design and tissue sample processing. Inbred Fischer 344 rats were subjected to a progressive treadmill training protocol. Tissues were collected from male and female animals that remained sedentary or completed 1, 2, 4 or 8 weeks of endurance exercise training. For trained animals, samples were collected 48 h after their last exercise bout (red pins). b, Summary of molecular datasets included in this study. Up to nine data types (omes) were generated for blood, plasma, and 18 solid tissues, per animal: ACETYL: acetylproteomics; protein site acetylation; ATAC, chromatin accessibility, ATAC-seq data; IMMUNO, multiplexed immunoassays; METAB, metabolomics and lipidomics; METHYL, DNA methylation, RRBS data; PHOSPHO, phosphoproteomics; protein site phosphorylation; PROT, global proteomics; protein abundance; TRNSCRPT, transcriptomics, RNA-seq data; UBIQ, ubiquitylome, protein site ubiquitination. Tissue labels indicate the location, colour code, and abbreviation for each tissue used throughout this study: ADRNL, adrenal gland; BAT, brown adipose tissue; BLOOD, whole blood, blood RNA; COLON, colon; CORTEX, cerebral cortex; HEART, heart; HIPPOC, hippocampus; HYPOTH, hypothalamus; KIDNEY, kidney; LIVER, liver; LUNG, lung; OVARY, ovaries; PLASMA, plasma; SKM-GN, gastrocnemius (skeletal muscle); SKM-VL, vastus lateralis (skeletal muscle); SMLINT, small intestine; SPLEEN, spleen; TESTES, testes; VENACV, vena cava; WAT-SC, subcutaneous white adipose tissue. Icons next to each tissue label indicate the data types generated for that tissue. c, Number of training-regulated features at 5% FDR. Each cell represents results for a single tissue and data type. Colours indicate the proportion of measured features that are differential.

Whole blood, plasma and 18 solid tissues were analysed using genomics, proteomics, metabolomics and protein immunoassay technologies, with most assays performed in a subset of these tissues (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Fig. 1e,f). Specific details for each omic analysis are provided in Extended Data Fig. 2, Methods, Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Table 1. Molecular assays were prioritized on the basis of available tissue quantity and biological relevance, with the gastrocnemius, heart, liver and white adipose tissue having the most diverse set of molecular assays performed, followed by the kidney, lung, brown adipose tissue and hippocampus (Extended Data Fig. 1e). Altogether, datasets were generated from 9,466 assays across 211 combinations of tissues and molecular platforms, resulting in 681,256 non-epigenetic and 14,334,496 epigenetic (reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq)) measurements, corresponding to 213,689 and 2,799,307 unique non-epigenetic and epigenetic features, respectively.

Differential analysis was used to characterize the molecular responses to endurance training (Methods). We computed the overall significance of the training response for each feature, denoted as the training P value, where 35,439 features at 5% false discovery rate (FDR) comprise the training-regulated differential features (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 2). Timewise summary statistics quantify the exercise training effects for each sex and time point. Training-regulated molecules were observed in the vast majority of tissues for all omes, including a relatively large proportion of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and immunoassay features (Fig. 1c). The observed timewise effects were modest: 56% of the per-feature maximum fold changes were between 0.67 and 1.5. Permutation testing showed that permuting the group or sex labels resulted in a significant reduction in the number of selected analytes in most tissues (Extended Data Fig. 3a-d and Supplementary Discussion). For transcriptomics, the hypothalamus, cortex, testes and vena cava had the smallest proportion of training-regulated genes, whereas the blood, brown and white adipose tissues, adrenal gland and colon showed more extensive effects (Fig. 1c). For proteomics, the gastrocnemius, heart and liver showed substantial differential regulation in both protein abundance and post-translational modifications (PTMs), with more restricted results in white adipose tissue, lung and kidney protein abundance. For metabolomics, a large proportion of differential metabolites were consistently observed across all tissues, although the absolute numbers were related to the number of metabolomic platforms used (Extended Data Fig. 1e). The vast number of differential features over the training time course across tissues and omes highlights the multi-faceted, organism-wide nature of molecular adaptations to endurance training.

Multi-tissue response to training

To identify tissue-specific and multi-tissue training-responsive gene expression, we considered the six tissues with the deepest molecular profiling: gastrocnemius, heart, liver, white adipose tissue, lung and kidney. In sum, 11,407 differential features from these datasets were mapped to their cognate gene, for a total of 7,115 unique genes across the tissues (Fig. 2a, Extended Data Fig. 4a and Supplementary Table 3). Most of the genes with at least one training-responsive feature were tissue-specific (67%), with the greatest number appearing in white adipose tissue (Fig. 2a). We identified pathways enriched by these tissue-specific training-responsive genes (Extended Data Fig. 4b) and tabulated a subset of highly specific genes to gain insight into tissue-specific training adaptation (Supplementary Table 4). Focusing on sexually conserved responses revealed tissue-dependent adaptations. These included changes related to immune cell recruitment and tissue remodelling in the lung, cofactor and cholesterol biosynthesis in the liver, ion flux in the heart, and metabolic processes and striated muscle contraction in the gastrocnemius (Supplementary Discussion). A detailed analysis of white adipose tissue adaptations to exercise training is provided elsewhere14. We also observed 'ome'-specific responses, with unique transcript and protein responses at the gene and pathway levels (Extended Data Fig. 4c,d, Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Tables 5 and 6).

Fig. 2: Multi-tissue molecular endurance training responses.

a, UpSet plot of the training-regulated gene sets associated with each tissue. Bars and dots indicating tissue-specific differential genes are coloured by tissue. Pathway enrichment analysis is shown for selected sets of genes in b,c as indicated by the arrows. b,c, Significantly enriched pathways (10% FDR) corresponding to genes that are differential in both LUNG and WAT-SC datasets (b) and the 22 genes that are training-regulated in all six tissues considered in a (c). Redundant pathways (those with an overlap of 80% or greater with an existing pathway) were removed. ESR, oestrogen receptor; TH17, T helper 17.

2,359 genes had differential features in at least two tissues (Fig. 2a). Lung and white adipose tissue had the largest set of uniquely shared genes (n = 249), with predominantly immune-related pathway enrichments (Fig. 2b); expression patterns suggested decreased inflammation in the lung and increased immune cell recruitment in white adipose tissue (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Heart and gastrocnemius had the second-largest group of uniquely shared genes, with enrichment of mitochondrial metabolism pathways including the mitochondria fusion genes Opa1 and Mfn1 (Supplementary Table 3).

Twenty-two genes were training-regulated in all six tissues, with particular enrichment in heat shock response pathways (Fig. 2c). Exercise induces the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs) in various rodent and human tissues15. A focused analysis of our transcriptomics and proteomics data revealed HSPs as prominent outliers (Extended Data Fig. 5a and Supplementary Discussion). Specifically, there was a marked, proteomics-driven up-regulation in the abundance of HSPs, including the major HSPs HSPA1B and HSP90AA1 (Extended Data Fig. 5b,c). Another ubiquitous endurance training response involved regulation of the kininogenases KNG1 and KNG2 (Supplementary Table 3). These enzymes are part of the kallikrein-kininogen system and have been implicated in the hypotensive and insulin-sensitizing effects of exercise16,17.

Transcription factors and phosphosignalling

We used proteomics and transcriptomics data to infer changes in transcription factor and phosphosignalling activities in response to endurance training through transcription factor and PTM enrichment analyses (Methods). We compared the most significantly enriched transcription factors across tissues (Fig. 3a, Extended Data Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 7). In the blood, we observed enrichment of the haematopoietic-associated transcription factors GABPA, ETS1, KLF3 and ZNF143; haematopoietic progenitors are proposed to be transducers of the health benefits of exercise18. In the heart and skeletal muscle, we observed a cluster of enriched Mef2 family transcription factor motifs (Fig. 3a). MEF2C is a muscle-associated transcription factor involved in skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscle cell differentiation and has been implicated in vascular development, formation of the cardiac loop and neuron differentiation19.

Fig. 3: Regulatory signalling pathways modulated by endurance training.

a, Transcription factor motif enrichment analysis of the training-regulated transcripts in each tissue. The heat map shows enrichment z-scores across the differential genes for the 13 tissues that had at least 300 genes after mapping transcript IDs to gene symbols. Transcription factors were hierarchically clustered by their enrichment across tissues. CRE, cAMP response element. b, Estimate of activity changes in selected kinases and signalling pathways using PTM signature enrichment analysis on phosphoproteomics data. Only kinases or pathways with a significant difference in at least one tissue, sex or time point (q value < 0.05) are shown. The heat map shows normalized enrichment score (NES) as colour; tissue, sex and time point combinations as columns, and either kinases or pathways as rows. Kinases are grouped by family; rows are hierarchically clustered within each group. FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Phosphorylation signatures of key kinases were altered across many tissues (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Table 8). This included AKT1 across heart, kidney and lung, mTOR across heart, kidney and white adipose tissue, and MAPK across heart and kidney. The liver showed an increase in the phosphosignature related to regulators of hepatic regeneration, including EGFR1, IGF and HGF (Extended Data Fig. 6b, Supplementary Discussion). Increased phosphorylation of STAT3 and PXN, HGF targets involved in cell proliferation, suggest a mechanism for liver regeneration in response to exercise (Extended Data Fig. 6c). In the heart, kinases showed bidirectional changes in their predicted basal activity in response to endurance training (Extended Data Fig. 6d and Supplementary Discussion). Several AGC protein kinases showed a decrease in predicted activity, including AKT1, whereas tyrosine kinases, including SRC and mTOR, were predicted to have increased activity. The known SRC target phosphorylation sites GJA1 pY265 and CDH2 pY820 showed significantly increased phosphorylation in response to training (Extended Data Fig. 6e). Notably, phosphorylation of GJA1 Y265 has previously been shown to disrupt gap junctions, key transducers of cardiac electrical conductivity20. This suggests that SRC signalling may regulate extracellular structural remodelling of the heart to promote physiologically beneficial adaptations. In agreement with this hypothesis, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of extracellular matrix proteins revealed a negative enrichment in response to endurance training, showing decreased abundance of proteins such as basement membrane proteins (Extended Data Fig. 6f-h and Supplementary Table 9).

Molecular hubs of exercise adaptation

To compare the dynamic multi-omic responses to endurance training across tissues, we clustered the 34,244 differential features with complete timewise summary statistics using an empirical Bayes graphical clustering approach (Methods). By integrating these results onto a graph, we summarize the dynamics of the molecular training response and identify groups of features with similar responses (Extended Data Fig. 7 and Supplementary Table 10). We performed pathway enrichment analysis for many graphically defined clusters to characterize putative underlying biology (Supplementary Table 11).

We examined biological processes associated with training using the pathway enrichment results for up-regulated features at 8 weeks of training (Extended Data Fig. 8, Supplementary Table 12 and Supplementary Discussion). Compared with other tissues, the liver showed substantial regulation of chromatin accessibility, including in the nuclear receptor signalling and cellular senescence pathways. In the gastrocnemius, terms related to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) signalling and lipid synthesis and degradation were enriched at the protein level, driven by proteins including the lipid droplet features PLIN2, PLIN4 and PLIN5. At the metabolomic level, terms related to ether lipid and glycerophospholipid metabolism were enriched. Together, these enrichments highlight the well-known ability of endurance training to modulate skeletal muscle lipid composition, storage, synthesis and metabolism. The blood displayed pathway enrichments related to translation and organelle biogenesis and maintenance. Paired with the transcription factor analysis (Fig. 3a), this suggests increased haematopoietic cellular mobilization in the blood. Less studied tissues in the context of exercise training, including the adrenal gland, spleen, cortex, hippocampus and colon, also showed regulation of diverse pathways (Supplementary Discussion).

To identify the main temporal or sex-associated responses in each tissue, we summarized the graphical cluster sizes by tissue and time (Extended Data Fig. 7a). We observed that the small intestine and plasma had more changes at weeks 1 and 2 of training. Conversely, many up-regulated features in brown adipose tissue and down-regulated features in white adipose tissue were observed only at week 8. The largest proportion of opposite effects between males and females was observed at week 1 in the adrenal gland. Other tissues, including the blood, heart, lung, kidney and skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis), had relatively consistent numbers of up-regulated and down-regulated features.

We next focused on characterizing shared molecular responses in the three striated muscles (gastrocnemius, vastus lateralis and heart). The three largest graphical clustering paths of differential features in each muscle tissue converged to a sex-consistent response by week 8 (Fig. 4a). Because of the large number of muscle features that were up-regulated in both sexes at week 8, we further examined the corresponding multi-omic set of analytes (Fig. 4b). Pathway enrichment analysis of the genes associated with these differential features demonstrated a sex- and muscle-consistent endurance training response that reflected up-regulation of mitochondrial metabolism, biogenesis and translation, and cellular response to heat stress (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Table 11).

Fig. 4: Temporal patterns of the molecular training response.

a, Graphical representation of training-differential features in the three muscle tissues: gastrocnemius (SKM-GN), vastus lateralis (SKM-VL) and heart. Each node represents one of nine possible states (rows) at each of the four training time points (columns). Triangles to the left of row labels map states to symbols used in Fig. 5a. Edges represent the path of differential features over the training time course (see Extended Data Fig. 7 for a detailed explanation). Each graph includes the three largest paths of differential features in that tissue, with edges split by data type. Both node and edge size are proportional to the number of features represented. The node corresponding to features that are up-regulated in both sexes at 8 weeks of training (8w_F1_M1) is circled in each graph. b, Line plots of standardized abundances of all 8w_F1_M1 muscle features. The black line represents the average value across all features. c, Network view of significant pathway enrichment results (10% FDR) corresponding to the features in b. Nodes represent pathways; edges represent functionally similar node pairs (set similarity ≥ 0.3). Nodes are included only if they are significantly enriched in at least two of the muscle tissues, as indicated by node colour. Node size is proportional to the number of differential feature sets (for example, gastrocnemius transcripts) for which the pathway is significantly enriched. High-level biological themes were defined using Louvain community detection of the nodes. d, A subnetwork of a larger cluster identified by network clustering 8w_F1_M1 features from SKM-GN. Mech., mechanical.

We used a network connectivity analysis to study up-regulated features in the gastrocnemius at week 8 (Extended Data Fig. 9a,b, Methods and Supplementary Discussion). Mapping features to genes revealed overlaps between transcriptomic, chromatin accessibility, and proteomic assays, but no overlaps with methylation. Three molecular interaction networks were compared (Methods), and BioGRID21 was used for further clustering analysis, which identified three clusters (Extended Data Fig. 9c and Supplementary Table 13). The largest cluster was significantly enriched for multiple muscle adaptation processes (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Table 14). This analysis illustrates the direct linkage among pathways and putative central regulators, emphasizing the importance of multi-omic data in identifying interconnected networks and understanding skeletal muscle remodelling.

Connection to human diseases and traits

To systematically evaluate the translational value of our data, we integrated our results with extant exercise studies and disease ontology (DO) annotations (Methods). First, we compared our vastus lateralis transcriptomics results to a meta-analysis of long-term training gene-expression changes in human skeletal muscle tissue8, demonstrating a significant and direction-consistent overlap (Extended Data Fig. 9d-g and Supplementary Discussion). We also identified a significant overlap between differential transcripts in the gastrocnemius of female rats trained for 8 weeks and differentially expressed genes identified in the soleus in a study of sedentary and exercise-trained female rats selectively bred for high or low exercise capacity22 (Extended Data Fig. 9h). Similarly, adaptations from high-intensity interval training in humans23 significantly overlapped with the proteomics response in rats (Extended Data Fig. 9i), particularly for female rats trained for 8 weeks (Extended Data Fig. 9j). Finally, we performed DO enrichment analysis using the DOSE R package24 (Supplementary Table 15 and Methods). Down-regulated genes from white adipose tissue, kidney and liver were enriched for several disease terms, suggesting a link between the exercise response and type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity and kidney disease (5% FDR; Extended Data Fig. 9k and Supplementary Discussion), which are all epidemiologically related co-occurring diseases25. Overall, these results support a high concordance of our data from rats with human studies and their relevance to human disease.

Sex-specific responses to exercise

Many tissues showed sex differences in their training responses (Extended Data Fig. 10), with 58% of the 8-week training-regulated features demonstrating sex-differentiated responses. Opposite responses between the sexes were observed in adrenal gland transcripts, lung phosphosites and chromatin accessibility features, white adipose tissue transcripts and liver acetylsites. In addition, proinflammatory cytokines exhibited sex-associated changes across tissues (Extended Data Fig. 11a,b and Supplementary Table 16). Most female-specific cytokines were differentially regulated between weeks 1 and 2 of training, whereas most male-specific cytokines were differentially regulated between weeks 4 and 8 (Extended Data Fig. 11c).

We observed extensive transcriptional remodelling of the adrenal gland, with more than 4,000 differential genes. Notably, the largest graphical path of training-regulated features was negatively correlated between males and females, with sustained down-regulation in females and transient up-regulation at 1 week in males (Extended Data Fig. 11d). The genes in this path were also associated with steroid hormone synthesis pathways and metabolism, particularly those pertaining to mitochondrial function (Supplementary Table 11). Further, transcription factor motif enrichment analysis of the transcripts in this path showed enrichment of 14 transcription factors (5% FDR; Supplementary Table 17), including the metabolism-regulating factors PPARγ, PPARα and oestrogen-related receptor gamma (ERRγ). The gene-expression levels of several significantly enriched transcription factors themselves followed the same trajectory as this path (Extended Data Fig. 11e).

In the rat lung, we observed decreased phosphosignalling activity with training primarily in males (Fig. 3b). Among these, the PRKACA phosphorylation signature showed the largest sex difference at 1 and 2 weeks (Extended Data Fig. 11f-h and Supplementary Table 8). PRKACA is a kinase that is involved in signalling within multiple cellular pathways. However, four PRKACA substrates followed this pattern and were associated with cellular structures (such as cytoskeleton and cell-cell junctions): DSP, MYLK, STMN1 and SYNE1 (Extended Data Fig. 11i). The phosphorylation of these proteins suggests a sex-dependent role of PRKACA in mediating changes in lung structure or mechanical function with training. This is supported as DSP and MYLK have essential roles in alveolar and epithelial cell remodelling in the lung26,27.

Immune pathway enrichment analysis of training-regulated transcripts at 8 weeks showed limited enrichment in muscle (heart, gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis) and brain (cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus), down-regulation in the lung and small intestine, and strong up-regulation in brown and white adipose tissue in males only (Fig. 5a, Extended Data Fig. 12a and Supplementary Table 11). Many of the same immune pathways (Supplementary Table 18) and immune-related transcription factors (Supplementary Table 19) were enriched in both adipose tissues in males. Furthermore, correlation between the transcript expression profiles of male-specific up-regulated features in the adipose tissues and immune cell markers from external cell-typing assays revealed a strong positive correlation for many immune cell types, including B, T and natural killer cells, and low correlation with platelets, erythrocytes and lymphatic tissue (Fig. 5b,c, Methods and Supplementary Table 20). These patterns suggest recruitment of peripheral immune cells or proliferation of tissue-resident immune cells as opposed to non-biological variation in blood or lymph content. Correlations at the protein level were not as marked (Extended Data Fig. 12b,c). Complementary analyses using CIBERTSORTx produced similar results (Extended Data Fig. 12d,e). In summary, our data suggest an important role of immune cell activity in the adaptation of male adipose tissue to endurance training.

Fig. 5: Training-induced immune responses.

a, Enrichment analysis results of the training-differential transcripts at 8 weeks in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) immune system pathways (10% FDR). NK, natural killer. b, Line plots of standardized abundances of selected training-differential transcripts. Brown and white adipose tissue show male-specific up-regulation at week 8 (8w_F0_M1). The small intestine (SMLINT) shows down-regulation in females and partial down-regulation in males at week 8 (8w_F-1_M0 or 8w_F-1_M-1). c, Box plots of the sample-level Pearson correlation between markers of immune cell types, lymphatic tissue or cell proliferation and the average value of features in b at the transcript level. A pink dot indicates that the marker is also one of the differential features plotted in b. A pound sign indicates that the distribution of Pearson correlations for a set of at least two markers is significantly different from 0 (two-sided one-sample t-test, 5% FDR). When only one marker is used to define a category on the y axis, the gene name is provided in parentheses. In box plots, the centre line represents median, box bounds represent 25th and 75th percentiles, whiskers represent minimum and maximum excluding outliers and blue dots represent outliers.

The small intestine was among the tissues with the highest enrichment in immune-related pathways (Extended Data Fig. 12a), with down-regulation of transcripts at 8 weeks, and a more robust response in females (Fig. 5b). This transcript set was significantly enriched with pathways related to gut inflammation (Supplementary Table 11). We observed positive associations between these transcripts and markers of several immune cell types, including B, T, natural killer and dendritic cells, suggesting decreased abundance (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Discussion). Endurance training also decreased the expression of transcripts with genetic risk loci for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including major histocompatability complex class II28, a finding that also emerged through the DO enrichment analysis (Supplementary Table 15). Endurance training is suggested to reduce systemic inflammation, in part by increasing gut microbial diversity and gut barrier integrity29. In accordance, we observed decreases in Cxcr3 and Il1a with training (Extended Data Fig. 12f), both of which are implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD30,31. Together, these data suggest that endurance training improves gut homeostasis, potentially conferring systemic anti-inflammatory effects.

Multi-tissue changes in mitochondria and lipids

We summarized the organism-wide metabolic changes for metabolomic datasets using RefMet metabolite classes (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 21) and for non-metabolomics datasets using metabolic subcategories of KEGG pathways (10% FDR; Extended Data Fig. 13a and Supplementary Table 11). The liver showed the greatest number of significantly enriched metabolite classes, followed by the heart, lung and hippocampus (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Discussion). Inspection of individual metabolites and acylcarnitine groups revealed changes associated with functional alterations in response to training (Extended Data Fig. 13b-d and Supplementary Discussion). Of particular interest, trimethylamine-N-oxide has been associated with cardiovascular disease32. We observed up-regulation of 1-methylhistidine, a marker of muscle protein turnover, in the kidney at 1, 2 and 4 weeks, which may indicate muscle breakdown and clearance through the kidney during early training time points. Cortisol levels were increased as expected from the physiological stress of training, and we observed a substantial increase in the kidney, again probably owing to renal clearance33. The liver showed up-regulation of 1-methylnicotinamide, which may have a role in inflammation34, at 8 weeks.

Fig. 6: Training-induced changes in metabolism.

a, RefMet metabolite class enrichment calculated using GSEA with the −log10 training P value. Significant chemical class enrichments (5% FDR) are shown as black circles with size is proportional to FDR. Small grey circles are chemical class enrichments that were not significant, and blank cells were not tested owing to low numbers of detected metabolites. TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle. b, GSEA results using the MitoCarta MitoPathways gene set database and proteomics (PROT) or acetylome (ACETYL) timewise summary statistics for training. NESs are shown for significant pathways (10% FDR). Mitochondrial pathways shown as rows are grouped using the parental group in the MitoPathways hierarchy. OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation. c, Line plots of standardized abundances of liver training-differential features across all data types that are up-regulated in both sexes, with a later response in females (LIVER: 1w_F0_M1 − >2w_F0_M1 − >4w_F0_M1 − >8w_F1_M1). The black line represents the average value across all features. d, Network view of pathway enrichment results corresponding to features in c. Nodes indicate significantly enriched pathways (10% FDR); edges connect nodes if there is a similarity score of at least 0.375 between the gene sets driving each pathway enrichment. Node colours indicate omes in which the enrichment was observed. e, log2 fold changes (logFC) relative to sedentary controls for metabolites within the 'Lipids and lipid related compounds' category in the 8-week liver. Heat map colour represents fold change (red, positive; blue, negative). Compounds are grouped into columns based on category (coloured bars).

The heart showed enrichment of various carbohydrate metabolism subcategories across many omes (Extended Data Fig. 13a), and remarkably, all enzymes within the glycolysis-gluconeogenesis pathway showed a consistent increase in abundance, except for GPI, FBP2 and DLAT (Extended Data Fig. 13e). Oxidative phosphorylation was enriched in most tissues and is consistent with the joint analyses of the muscle tissues (Fig. 4c), suggesting potential changes in mitochondria biogenesis. We estimated proportional mitochondrial changes to endurance training using mitochondrial RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) reads (Extended Data Fig. 14a-c) and changes of mitochondrial functions through GSEA using gene expression, protein abundance and protein PTMs (Fig. 6b, Extended Data Fig. 14d and Supplementary Tables 22-25). Increased mitochondrial biogenesis was observed in skeletal muscle, heart and liver across these analyses. Moreover, sex-specific mitochondrial changes were observed in the adrenal gland, as described above, and in the colon, lung and kidney. These results highlight a highly adaptive and pervasive mitochondrial response to endurance training; a more in-depth analysis of this response is provided elsewhere35.

In the liver, we observed substantial regulation of metabolic pathways across the proteome, acetylome and lipidome (Fig. 6a,b and Extended Data Fig. 13a). For example, there was significant enrichment in 12 metabolite classes belonging to 'lipids and lipid-related compounds' (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Table 26). We therefore focused on the large group of features that increased in abundance over time for both sexes (Fig. 6c). Most of these liver features corresponded to protein abundance and protein acetylation changes in the mitochondrial, amino acid and lipid metabolic pathways (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Table 27). We also observed an increase in phosphatidylcholines and a concomitant decrease in triacylglycerols (Fig. 6e). Finally, there was increased abundance and acetylation of proteins from the peroxisome, an organelle with key functions in lipid metabolism (Extended Data Fig. 14e). To our knowledge, these extensive changes in protein acetylation in response to endurance training have not been described previously. Together, these molecular adaptations may constitute part of the mechanisms underlying exercise-mediated improvements in liver health, particularly protection against excessive intrahepatic lipid storage and steatosis36.

Discussion

Mapping the molecular exercise responses across a whole organism is critical for understanding the beneficial effects of exercise. Previous studies are limited to a few tissues, a narrow temporal range, or a single sex. Substantially expanding on the current work in the field, we used 25 distinct molecular platforms in as many as 19 tissues to study the temporal changes to endurance exercise training in male and female rats. Accordingly, we identified thousands of training-induced changes within and across tissues, including temporal and sex-biased responses, in mRNA transcripts, proteins, post-translational modifications and metabolites. Each omic dataset provides unique insights into exercise adaptation, where a holistic understanding requires multi-omic analysis. This work illustrates how mining our data resource can both recapitulate expected mechanisms and provide novel biological insights.

This work can be leveraged to deepen our understanding of exercise-related improvement of health and disease management. The global heat shock response to exercise may confer cytoprotective effects, including in pathologies related to tissue damage and injury recovery37. Increased acetylation of liver mitochondrial enzymes and regulation of lipid metabolism may link exercise to protection against non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and steatohepatitis36. Similarly, exercise-mediated modulation of cytokines, receptors and transcripts linked to intestinal inflammation or IBD may be associated with improved gut health. These examples highlight unique training responses illuminated by a multi-omics approach that can be leveraged for future hypothesis-driven research on how exercise improves whole-body and tissue-specific health.

We note limitations in our experimental design, datasets and analyses (Supplementary Discussion). In short, samples were collected 48 h after the last exercise bout to capture sustained alterations, thereby excluding acute responses. Our assays were performed on bulk tissue and do not cover single-cell platforms. Our resource has limited omic characterization for certain tissues, and additional platforms with emerging biological relevance were not utilized, including microbiome profiling. Moreover, our results are hypothesis-generating and require biological validation; supporting this, we have established a publicly accessible tissue bank from this study.

This MoTrPAC resource provides future opportunities to enhance and refine the molecular map of the endurance training response. We expect that this dataset will remain an ongoing platform to translate tissue- and sex-specific molecular changes in rats to humans. MoTrPAC has made extensive efforts to facilitate access, exploration and interpretation of this resource. We developed the MoTrPAC Data Hub to easily explore and download data (https://motrpac-data.org/), software packages to provide reproducible source code and facilitate data retrieval and analysis in R (MotrpacRatTraining6mo and MotrpacRatTraining6moData38,39), and visualization tools for data exploration (https://data-viz.motrpac-data.org). Altogether, this multi-omic resource serves as a broadly useful reference for studying the milieu of molecular changes in endurance training adaptation and provides new opportunities to understand the effects of exercise on health and disease.

Methods

All methods are included in the Supplementary Information.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

MoTrPAC data are publicly available via http://motrpac-data.org/data-access. Data access inquiries should be sent to motrpac-helpdesk@lists.stanford.edu. Additional resources can be found at http://motrpac.org and https://motrpac-data.org/. Interactive data visualizations are provided through a website (https://data-viz.motrpac-data.org) and HTML reports summarizing the multi-omic graphical analysis results in each tissue40. Processed data and analysis results are additionally available in the MotrpacRatTraining6moData R package39 (https://github.com/MoTrPAC/MotrpacRatTraining6moData). Raw and processed data for were deposited in the appropriate public repositories as follows. RNA-seq, ATAC-seq and RRBS data were deposited at the Sequence Read Archive under accession PRJNA908279 and at the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession GSE242358; multiplexed immunoassays were deposited at IMMPORT under accession SDY2193; metabolomics data were deposited at Metabolomics Workbench under project ID PR001020; and proteomics data were deposited at MassIVE under accessions MSV000092911, MSV000092922, MSV000092923, MSV000092924, MSV000092925 and MSV000092931. We used the following external datasets: release 96 of the Ensembl R. norvegicus (rn6) genome (https://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-96/fasta/rattus_norvegicus/dna/) and gene annotation (https://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-96/gtf/rattus_norvegicus/Rattus_norvegicus.Rnor_6.0.96.gtf.gz); RefSeq protein database (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/R_norvegicus/, downloaded 11/2018); the NCBI gene2refseq mapping files (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/DATA/gene2refseq.gz, accessed 18 December 2020); RGD rat gene annotation (https://download.rgd.mcw.edu/data_release/RAT/GENES_RAT.txt, accessed 12 November 2021); BioGRID v4.2.193 (https://downloads.thebiogrid.org/File/BioGRID/Release-Archive/BIOGRID-4.2.193/BIOGRID-ORGANISM-4.2.193.tab3.zip); STRING v11.5 (https://stringdb-downloads.org/download/protein.physical.links.v11.5/10116.protein.physical.links.v11.5.txt.gz); GENCODE release 39 metadata and annotation files (https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/gencode/Gencode_human/release_39/, accessed 20 January 2022); MatrisomeDB (https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1009); MitoPathways database available through MitoCarta (https://personal.broadinstitute.org/scalvo/MitoCarta3.0/); PTMSigDB v1.9.0 PTM set database (https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.TIR118.000943); UniProt human proteome FASTA for canonical protein sequences (UniProtKB query "reviewed:true AND proteome:up000005640", download date 3 March 2021); the CIBERSORT LM22 leukocyte gene signature matrix (https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_12); published results from Amar et al.8, Bye et al.22 and Hostrup et al.23; and GTEx v8 gene-expression data (dbGaP Accession phs000424.v8.p2). Details are provided in the Supplementary Information, Methods.

References

  1. Blair, S. N. et al. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA 262, 2395-2401 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Booth, F. W., Roberts, C. K. & Laye, M. J. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr. Physiol. 2, 1143-1211 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Neufer, P. D. et al. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of physical activity-induced health benefits. Cell Metab. 22, 4-11 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanford, J. A. et al. Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC): mapping the dynamic responses to exercise. Cell 181, 1464-1474 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nocon, M. et al. Association of physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 15, 239-246 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, S. C. et al. Association of leisure-time physical activity with risk of 26 types of cancer in 1.44 million adults. JAMA. Intern. Med. 176, 816-825 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pedersen, B. K. & Saltin, B. Exercise as medicine — evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 25, 1-72 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amar, D. et al. Time trajectories in the transcriptomic response to exercise - a meta-analysis. Nat. Commun. 12, 3471 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibb, A. A. et al. Exercise-induced changes in glucose metabolism promote physiological cardiac growth. Circulation 136, 2144-2157 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindholm, M. E. et al. An integrative analysis reveals coordinated reprogramming of the epigenome and the transcriptome in human skeletal muscle after training. Epigenetics 9, 1557-1569 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Overmyer, K. A. et al. Maximal oxidative capacity during exercise is associated with skeletal muscle fuel selection and dynamic changes in mitochondrial protein acetylation. Cell Metab. 21, 468-478 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pillon, N. J. et al. Transcriptomic profiling of skeletal muscle adaptations to exercise and inactivity. Nat. Commun. 11, 470 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sato, S. et al. Atlas of exercise metabolism reveals time-dependent signatures of metabolic homeostasis. Cell Metab. 34, 329-345.e8 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Many, G. M. Sexual dimorphism and the multi-omic response to exercise training in rat subcutaneous white adipose tissue. Nat. Metab. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-023-00959-9 (2024).

  15. Henstridge, D. C., Febbraio, M. A. & Hargreaves, M. Heat shock proteins and exercise adaptations. Our knowledge thus far and the road still ahead. J. Appl. Physiol. 120, 683-691 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dumke, C. L., Kim, J., Arias, E. B. & Cartee, G. D. Role of kallikrein-kininogen system in insulin-stimulated glucose transport after muscle contractions. J. Appl. Physiol. 92, 657-664 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vettor, R. et al. Effect of exercise on plasma kallikrein and muscular phospholipase A2 activity in rats. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 45, 65-70 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Lisio, M. & Parise, G. Exercise and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: protection, quantity, and function. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 41, 116-122 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho, E.-G. et al. MEF2C enhances dopaminergic neuron differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in a parkinsonian rat model. PLoS ONE 6, e24027 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, R., Warn-Cramer, B. J., Kurata, W. E. & Lau, A. F. v-Src phosphorylation of connexin 43 on Tyr247 and Tyr265 disrupts gap junctional communication. J. Cell Biol. 154, 815-827 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Oughtred, R. et al. The BioGRID database: a comprehensive biomedical resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions. Protein Sci.30, 187-200 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bye, A. et al. Gene expression profiling of skeletal muscle in exercise-trained and sedentary rats with inborn high and low VO2max. Physiol. Genomics 35, 213-221 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hostrup, M. et al. High-intensity interval training remodels the proteome and acetylome of human skeletal muscle. eLife 11, e69802 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Yan, G.-R. & He, Q.-Y. DOSE: an R/Bioconductor package for disease ontology semantic and enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics 31, 608-609 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aguilar, D. Heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease: a clinical conundrum. Circ. Heart Fail. 9, e003316 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Moorsel, C. H. M. Desmoplakin: an important player in aging lung disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 202, 1201-1202 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, T. et al. Myosin light chain kinase (MYLK) coding polymorphisms modulate human lung endothelial cell barrier responses via altered tyrosine phosphorylation, spatial localization, and lamellipodial protrusions. Pulm. Circ. 8, 2045894018764171 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Jostins, L. et al. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 491, 119-124 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Clarke, S. F. et al. Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity. Gut 63, 1913-1920 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lammers, K. M. et al. Gliadin induces an increase in intestinal permeability and zonulin release by binding to the chemokine receptor CXCR3. Gastroenterology 135, 194-204.e3 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scarpa, M. et al. The epithelial danger signal IL-1α is a potent activator of fibroblasts and reactivator of intestinal inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 185, 1624-1637 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, Z. et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature 472, 57-63 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Daly, W., Seegers, C., Timmerman, S. & Hackney, A. C. Peak cortisol response to exhausting exercise: effect of blood sampling schedule. Med. Sportiva 8, 17-20 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, W. et al. Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase ameliorates renal fibrosis by its metabolite 1-methylnicotinamide inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway. FASEB J. 36, e22084 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Amar, D. et al. The mitochondrial multi-omic response to exercise training across tissues. Prepint at BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.13.523698 (2023).

  36. Thyfault, J. P. & Rector, R. S. Exercise combats hepatic steatosis: potential mechanisms and clinical implications. Diabetes 69, 517-524 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Dornbos, D. et al. Preischemic exercise reduces brain damage by ameliorating metabolic disorder in ischemia/reperfusion injury. J. Neurosci. Res. 91, 818-827 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gay, N. R., Amar, D., Beltran, P. M. J. & MoTrPAC Study Group. MotrpacRatTraining6mo: Analysis of the MoTrPAC endurance exercise training study in 6-month-old. R package version 1.6.3 https://motrpac.github.io/MotrpacRatTraining6mo/ (2023).

  39. Gay, N. R. & MoTrPAC Study Group. MotrpacRatTraining6moData: Data for analysis of the MoTrPAC endurance exercise training study in 6-month-old rats. R package version 1.9.0 https://motrpac.github.io/MotrpacRatTraining6moData/ (2023).

  40. Gay, N. R., Amar, D. & MoTrPAC Study Group. Visualization of graphical analysis results: Temporal dynamics of the multi-omic response to endurance exercise training across tissues. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7703294 (2023).

  41. Raja, A. et al. MoTrPAC/motrpac-rna-seq-pipeline. GitHub https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-rna-seq-pipeline (2023).

  42. Gay, N. R., Raja, A. & MoTrPAC Study Group. MoTrPAC/motrpac-atac-seq-pipeline. GitHub https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-atac-seq-pipeline (2023).

  43. Akre, S., Raja, A., Samdarshi, M. & MoTrPAC Study Group. MoTrPAC/motrpac-rrbs-pipeline. GitHub https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-rrbs-pipeline (2023).

  44. Jimenez-Morales, D., Samdarshi, M., Hershman, S. & MoTrPAC Study Group. MoTrPAC/motrpac-proteomics-pipeline. GitHub https://github.com/MoTrPAC/motrpac-proteomics-pipeline (2023).

  45. Amar, D., Samdarshi, M., Raja, A. & Gay, N. R. MoTrPAC/MotrpacRatTraining6moQCRep. GitHub https://github.com/MoTrPAC/MotrpacRatTraining6moQCRep (2023).

  46. McCarron, A. et al. Phenotypic characterization and comparison of cystic fibrosis rat models generated using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Am. J. Pathol. 190, 977-993 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding: The MoTrPAC Study is supported by NIH grants U24OD026629 (Bioinformatics Center), U24DK112349, U24DK112342, U24DK112340, U24DK112341, U24DK112326, U24DK112331, U24DK112348 (Chemical Analysis Sites), U01AR071133, U01AR071130, U01AR071124, U01AR071128, U01AR071150, U01AR071160, U01AR071158 (Clinical Centers), U24AR071113 (Consortium Coordinating Center), U01AG055133, U01AG055137 and U01AG055135 (PASS/Animal Sites). This work was also supported by other funding sources: NHGRI Institutional Training Grant in Genome Science 5T32HG000044 (N.R.G.), National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Grant No. NSF 1445197 (N.R.G.), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institute of Health F32 postdoctoral fellowship award F32HL154711 (P.M.J.B.), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (M.E.L.), National Science Foundation Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) CHE-1726528 (F.M.F.), National Institute on Aging P30AG044271 and P30AG003319 (N.M.), and NORC at the University of Chicago grant no. P30DK07247 (E.R.). Parts of this work were performed in the Environmental Molecular Science Laboratory, a US Department of Energy national scientific user facility at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, WA. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NIH or the US Department of Health and Human Services. Some figures were created using Biorender.com. Fig. 1b was modified with permission from ref. 46.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: David Amar, Nicole R. Gay, Pierre M. Jean-Beltran

  2. These authors jointly supervised this work: Sue C. Bodine, Steven A. Carr, Karyn A. Esser, Stephen B. Montgomery, Simon Schenk, Michael P. Snyder, Matthew T. Wheeler

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    David Amar, David Jimenez-Morales, Malene E. Lindholm, Shruti Marwaha, Archana Natarajan Raja, Jimmy Zhen, Euan Ashley, Matthew T. Wheeler, Karen P. Dalton, Steven G. Hershman, Mihir Samdarshi & Christopher Teng

  2. Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Nicole R. Gay, Bingqing Zhao, Jose J. Almagro Armenteros, Nasim Bararpour, Si Wu, Stephen B. Montgomery, Michael P. Snyder, Clarisa Chavez, Roxanne Chiu, Krista M. Hennig, Chia-Jui Hung, Christopher A. Jin & Navid Zebarjadi

  3. Proteomics Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Pierre M. Jean-Beltran, Hasmik Keshishian, Natalie M. Clark, Steven A. Carr, D. R. Mani, Charles C. Mundorff & Cadence Pearce

  4. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

    Dam Bae, Ana C. Lira, Sue C. Bodine, Michael Cicha, Luis Gustavo Oliveira De Sousa, Bailey E. Jackson, Kyle S. Kramer, Andrea G. Marshall & Collyn Z-T. Richards

  5. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Surendra Dasari

  6. Metabolomics Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Courtney Dennis, Julian Avila-Pacheco & Clary B. Clish

  7. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Charles R. Evans & Charles F. Burant

  8. School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    David A. Gaul, Evan M. Savage & Facundo M. Fernández

  9. Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Olga Ilkayeva, William E. Kraus & Kim M. Huffman

  10. Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

    Olga Ilkayeva, Michael J. Muehlbauer, William E. Kraus, Christopher Newgard, Kim M. Huffman & Megan E. Ramaker

  11. Emory Integrated Metabolomics and Lipidomics Core, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Anna A. Ivanova, Xueyun Liu & Kristal M. Maner-Smith

  12. BRCF Metabolomics Core, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Maureen T. Kachman, Alexander (Sasha) Raskind & Tanu Soni

  13. Division of Endocrinology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Ian R. Lanza

  14. Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Venugopalan D. Nair, Gregory R. Smith, Yongchao Ge, Stuart C. Sealfon, Mary Anne S. Amper, Kristy Guevara, Nada Marjanovic, German Nudelman, Hanna Pincas, Irene Ramos, Stas Rirak, Aliza B. Rubenstein, Frederique Ruf-Zamojski, Nitish Seenarine, Sindhu Vangeti, Mital Vasoya, Alexandria Vornholt, Xuechen Yu & Elena Zaslavsky

  15. Environmental Molecular Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA

    Paul D. Piehowski

  16. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA

    Jessica L. Rooney, Russell Tracy, Elaine Cornell, Nicole Gagne & Sandy May

  17. Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Kevin S. Smith, Nikolai G. Vetr, Stephen B. Montgomery & Daniel Nachun

  18. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Cynthia L. Stowe, Fang-Chi Hsu, Scott Rushing & Michael P. Walkup

  19. Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA

    Gina M. Many, James A. Sanford, Joshua N. Adkins, Wei-Jun Qian, Marina A. Gritsenko, Joshua R. Hansen, Chelsea Hutchinson-Bunch, Matthew E. Monroe, Ronald J. Moore, Michael D. Nestor, Vladislav A. Petyuk & Tyler J. Sagendorf

  20. Department of Biochemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Tiantian Zhang, Zhenxin Hou & Eric A. Ortlund

  21. Section on Integrative Physiology and Metabolism, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA

    David M. Presby, Laurie J. Goodyear, Brent G. Albertson, Tiziana Caputo, Michael F. Hirshman, Nathan S. Makarewicz, Pasquale Nigro & Krithika Ramachandran

  22. Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Alec Steep & Jun Z. Li

  23. Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Yifei Sun & Martin J. Walsh

  24. Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

    Yifei Sun & Martin J. Walsh

  25. Aging and Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA

    Sue C. Bodine

  26. Department of Physiology and Aging, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Karyn A. Esser & Marco Pahor

  27. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

    Simon Schenk

  28. Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Stephen B. Montgomery

  29. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

    Gary Cutter

  30. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

    Robert E. Gerszten & Jeremy M. Robbins

  31. Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Michael E. Miller

  32. Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    K. Sreekumaran Nair

  33. Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Trevor Hastie & Rob Tibshirani

  34. Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Rob Tibshirani

  35. Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Brian Bouverat, Christiaan Leeuwenburgh & Ching-ju Lu

  36. Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Barbara Nicklas

  37. Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    W. Jack Rejeski

  38. National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

    John P. Williams

  39. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Ashley Xia

  40. Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Elisabeth R. Barton

  41. Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    Frank W. Booth

  42. Department of Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    Frank W. Booth

  43. Department of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    Frank W. Booth & R. Scott Rector

  44. Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    Frank W. Booth

  45. Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA

    Roger Farrar

  46. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Andrea L. Hevener

  47. Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Benjamin G. Ke & Chongzhi Zang

  48. Section on Clinical, Behavioral, and Outcomes Research, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, MA, USA

    Sarah J. Lessard

  49. Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

    Andrea G. Marshall

  50. Department of Health Sciences, Stetson University, Deland, FL, USA

    Scott Powers

  51. Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    R. Scott Rector

  52. NextGen Precision Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    R. Scott Rector

  53. Cell Biology and Physiology, Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA

    John Thyfault

  54. Center for Skeletal Muscle Research at Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Zhen Yan

  55. Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Zhen Yan

  56. Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Zhen Yan

  57. Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Zhen Yan

  58. Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Center for Exercise Medicine Research at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, USA

    Zhen Yan

  59. Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

    Zhen Yan

  60. Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Ali Tugrul Balci & Maria Chikina

  61. Petit Institute of Bioengineering and Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Samuel G. Moore

  62. Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Karan Uppal

  63. Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

    Marcas Bamman & Anna Thalacker-Mercer

  64. Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA

    Bryan C. Bergman, Daniel H. Bessesen, Wendy M. Kohrt, Edward L. Melanson, Kerrie L. Moreau, Irene E. Schauer & Robert S. Schwartz

  65. Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

    Thomas W. Buford

  66. Human Performance Laboratory, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA

    Toby L. Chambers, Bridget Lester, Scott Trappe & Todd A. Trappe

  67. Translational Research Institute, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA

    Paul M. Coen, Bret H. Goodpaster & Lauren M. Sparks

  68. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA

    Dan Cooper, Fadia Haddad & Shlomit Radom-Aizik

  69. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA

    Kishore Gadde, Melissa Harris, Neil M. Johannsen, Tuomo Rankinen & Eric Ravussin

  70. College of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA

    Catherine M. Jankowski

  71. Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Nicolas Musi

  72. Population and Public Health, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA

    Robert L. Newton Jr

  73. Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Center for Metabolic Health, Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA

    Blake B. Rasmussen

  74. Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA

    Elena Volpi

Consortia

MoTrPAC Study Group

Lead Analysts

MoTrPAC Study Group

Contributions

All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript. Detailed author contributions are provided in the Supplementary Information.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sue C. Bodine, Karyn A. Esser, Simon Schenk, Stephen B. Montgomery, Michael P. Snyder, Steven A. Carr or Matthew T. Wheeler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.C.B. has equity in Emmyon, Inc. G.R.C. sits on data and safety monitoring boards for AI Therapeutics, AMO Pharma, Astra-Zeneca, Avexis Pharmaceuticals, Biolinerx, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics, Bristol Meyers Squibb/Celgene, CSL Behring, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Green Valley Pharma, Horizon Pharmaceuticals, Immunic, Mapi Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Holdings, Opko Biologics, Prothena Biosciences, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Reata Pharmaceuticals, NHLBI (protocol review committee), University of Texas Southwestern, University of Pennsylvania, Visioneering Technologies, Inc.; serves on consulting or advisory boards for Alexion, Antisense Therapeutics, Biogen, Clinical Trial Solutions LLC, Genzyme, Genentech, GW Pharmaceuticals, Immunic, Klein-Buendel Incorporated, Merck/Serono, Novartis, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals, Perception Neurosciences, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Recursion/Cerexis Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Roche, SAB Biotherapeutics; and is the president of Pythagoras Inc., a private consulting company. S.A.C. is a member of the scientific advisory boards of Kymera, PrognomiQ, PTM BioLabs, and Seer. M.P.S. is a cofounder and scientific advisor to Personalis, Qbio, January AI, Filtricine, SensOmics, Protos, Fodsel, Rthm, Marble and scientific advisor to Genapsys, Swaz, Jupiter. S.B.M. is a consultant for BioMarin, MyOme and Tenaya Therapeutics. D.A. is currently employed at Insitro, South San Francisco, CA. N.R.G. is currently employed at 23andMe, Sunnyvale, CA. P.M.J.B. is currently employed at Pfizer, Cambridge, MA. Insitro, 23andMe and Pfizer had no involvement in the work presented here.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Atul Deshmukh, Jorge Ruas and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Animal phenotyping and data availability.

a-d) Clinical measurements before and after the training intervention in untrained control rats (SED), 4-week trained rats (4w), and 8-week trained rats (8w). Data are displayed pre and post for each individual rat (connected by a line), with males in blue and females in pink. Filled symbols (n = 5 per sex and time point) represent rats used for all omics analyses, whereas the rat utilized for proteomics only (n = 1 per sex and time point) is represented by a non-filled symbol. Significant results by ANOVA of the overall group effect (#, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01) and interaction between group and time (§, p < 0.05; §§ p < 0.01) are indicated. Significant within-group differential responses from a Bonferroni post hoc test are indicated (*, q-value < 0.05; **, q-value < 0.01). a) Aerobic capacity through a VO2max test until exhaustion. Data are reported in ml/(kg.min) for all individual rats and time points. b) Body fat percentage. c) Percent lean mass. (b-c) were assessed through nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. d) Body weight (in grams). e) Description of available datasets. Colored cells indicate that data are available for that tissue and assay. Individual panels and platforms are shown for metabolomics and the multiplexed immunoassays. f) Detailed availability of sample-level data across assays. Each column represents an individual animal, ordered by training group and colored by sex. Gray cells indicate that data were generated for that animal and assay; black cells indicate that data were not generated. Rows are ordered by ome and colored by assay and tissue.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Quality control metrics for omics data.

a) Proteomics multiplexing design using TMT11 reagents for isobaric tagging and a pooled reference sample. The diagram describes processing of a single tissue. Following multiplexing, peptides were used for protein abundance analysis, serial PTM enriched for phosphosite and optional acetylsite quantification, or ubiquitylsite quantification through enrichment of lysine-diglycine ubiquitin remnants. b) Total number of fully quantified proteins per plex in each global proteome dataset. c-e) The total number of fully quantified phosphosites (c), acetylsites (d), and ubiquitylsites (e) per plex in each dataset. f) Distributions of coefficients of variation (CVs) calculated from metabolomics features identified in pooled samples and analyzed periodically throughout liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry runs. CVs were aggregated and plotted separately for named and unnamed metabolites. g) Transcription start site (TSS) enrichment (top) and fraction of reads in peaks (FRiP, bottom) across ATAC-seq samples per tissue. h) Distributions of RNA integrity numbers (RIN, top) and median 5′ to 3′ bias (bottom) across samples in each tissue in the RNA-Seq data. i) Percent methylation of CpG, CHG and CHH sites in the RRBS data. For boxplots in (h,i): center line represents median; box bounds represent 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers represent minimum and maximum excluding outliers; filled dots represent outliers. j) Number of wells across multiplexed immunoassays with fewer than 20 beads. Measurements from these 182 wells were excluded from downstream analysis. k) 2D density plot of targeted analytes' mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) versus corresponding CHEX4 MFI from the same well for each multiplexed immunoassay measurement, where CHEX4 is a measure of non-specific binding.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Permutation tests.

a-b) Permutation tests of groups within males (a) and females (b). For each sex, the original group labels were shuffled to minimize the number of animal pairs that remain in the same group. Only the group labels were shuffled and all other covariates remained as in the original data. For each permuted dataset, the differential abundance pipeline was rerun and the number of transcripts that were selected at 5% FDR adjustment were re-counted. c-d) Permutation tests of sex within groups. For each group and each sex, half of the animals were selected randomly and their sex was swapped. Only the sex labels were shuffled and all other covariates remained as in the original data. For each permutation the differential analysis pipeline was rerun and the timewise summary statistics were extracted. A gene was considered sexually dimorphic if for at least one time point the z-score (absolute) difference between males and females was greater than 3. c) Counts of sexually dimorphic genes among the IHW-selected genes of the original data. d) Counts of sexually dimorphic genes among the 5% FDR selected genes within each permuted dataset. Each boxplot in (a-d) represents the differential abundance analysis results over 100 permutations of the transcriptomics data in a specific tissue. Center line represents median; box bounds represent 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers represent minimum and maximum excluding outliers; open circles represent outliers. Added points represent the results of the true data labels, and their shape corresponds to the empirical p-value (●: p > 0.05; ×: 0.01 < p < 0.05; *: p ≤ 0.01).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Correlations between proteins and transcripts throughout endurance training.

a) Number of tissues in which each gene, including features mapped to genes from all omes, is training-regulated. Only differential features from the subset of tissues with deep molecular profiling (lung, gastrocnemius, subcutaneous white adipose, kidney, liver, and heart) and the subset of omes that were profiled in all six of these tissues (DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility, transcriptomics, global proteomics, phosphoproteomics, multiplexed immunoassays) were considered. Numbers above each bar indicate the number of genes that are differential in exactly the number of tissues indicated on the x-axis. b) Pathways significantly enriched by tissue-specific training-regulated genes represented in Fig. 2a (q-value < 0.1). KEGG and Reactome pathways were queried, and redundant pathways were removed (i.e., those with an overlap of 80% or greater with an existing pathway). c) Heatmaps showing the Pearson correlation between the TRNSCRPT and PROT timewise summary statistics (z- and t-scores, respectively) (top, gene-level) and pathway-level enrichment results (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis normalized enrichment scores) (bottom, pathway-level). d) Scatter plots of pathway GSEA NES of the TRNSCRPT and PROT datasets in the seven tissues for which these data were acquired. Pathways showing high discordance or agreement across TRNSCRPT and PROT and with functional relevance or general interest were highlighted.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Heat shock response.

a) Scatter plots of the protein t-scores (PROT) versus the transcript z-scores (TRNSCRPT) by gene at 8 weeks of training (8 W) relative to sedentary controls. Data are shown for the seven tissues for which both proteomics and transcriptomics was acquired. Red points indicate genes associated with the heat shock response, and the labeled points indicate those with a large differential response at the protein level. b-c) Line plots showing protein b) and transcript (c) log2 fold-changes relative to the untrained controls for a subset of heat shock proteins with increased abundance during exercise training. Each line represents a protein in a single tissue.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Regulatory signaling pathways modulated by endurance training.

a) Heatmap of differences in TF motif enrichment in training-regulated genes across tissues. Each value reflects the average difference in motif enrichment for shared transcription factors. Tissues are clustered with complete linkage hierarchical clustering. b) (left) Filtered PTM-SEA results for the liver showing kinases and signaling pathways with increased activity. (right) Heatmap showing t-scores for phosphosites within the HGF signaling pathway. c) Hypothetical model of HGF signaling effects during exercise training. Phosphorylation of STAT3 and PXN is known to modulate cell growth and cell migration, respectively. Error bars=SEM. d) Filtered PTM-SEA results for the heart showing selected kinases with significant enrichments in at least one time point. Heatmap shows the NES as color and enrichment p-value as dot size. Kinases are grouped by kinase family and sorted by hierarchical clustering. e) (top) Log2 fold-change of GJA1 and CDH2 protein abundance in the heart. No significant response to exercise training was observed for these proteins (F-test; q-value > 0.05). (bottom) Log2 fold-changes for selected Src kinase phosphosite targets, GJA1 pY265 and CDH2 pY820, in the heart. These phosphosites show a significant response to exercise training (F-test, 5% FDR). Error bars=SEM. f) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) results from the heart global proteome dataset using the matrisome gene set database. Heatmap shows NES as color and enrichment p-value as dot size. Rows are clustered using hierarchical clustering. g) Log2 fold-change for basement membrane proteins in heart. Proteins showing a significant response to exercise training are highlighted in orange (F-test; 5% FDR). Error bars=SEM. h) Log2 protein fold-change of NTN1 protein abundance in heart. A significant response to exercise training was observed for these proteins (F-test; 5% FDR). Error bars=SEM.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Graphical representation of differential results.

a) Number of training-regulated features assigned to groups of graphical states across tissues and time. Red points indicate features that are up-regulated in at least one sex (e.g., only in males: F0_M1; only in females: F1_M0; in both sexes: F1_M1), and blue points indicate features down-regulated in at least one sex (only in males: F0_M-1; only in females: F-1_M0; in both sexes: F-1_M-1). Green points indicate features that are up-regulated in males and down-regulated in females or vice versa (F-1_M1 and F1_M-1, respectively). Point size is proportional to the number of features. Point opacity is proportional to the within-tissue fraction of features represented by that point. Features can be represented in multiple points. The number of omes profiled in each tissue is provided in parentheses next to the tissue abbreviation. b) A schematic example of the graphical representation of the differential analysis results. Top: the z-scores of four features. A positive score corresponds to up-regulation (red), and a negative score corresponds to down regulation (blue). Bottom: the assignment of features to node sets and full path sets (edge sets are not shown for conciseness but can be easily inferred from the full paths). Node labels follow the [time]_F[x]_M[y] format where [time] shows the animal sacrifice week and can take one of (1w, 2w, 4w, or 8w), and [x] and [y] are one of (−1,0,1), corresponding to down-regulation, no effect, and up-regulation, respectively. c) Graphical representation of the feature sets. Columns are training time points, and rows are the differential abundance states. Node and edge sizes are proportional to the number of features that are assigned to each set.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Key pathway enrichments per tissue.

Key pathway enrichments for features that are up-regulated in both sexes at 8 weeks of training in each tissue. For display purposes, enrichment q-values were floored to 1e-10 (Enrichment FDR (−log10) = 10). Bars are colored by the number of omes for which the pathway was significantly enriched (q-value < 0.01) (lighter gray: 1 ome; darker gray: 2 omes; black: 3 omes). Pathways were selected from Supplementary Table 10.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Associations with signatures of human health and complex traits.

a) Jaccard coefficients between gene sets identified by different omes in 8-week gastrocnemius up-regulated features ("X" marks overlap p > 0.05). b) Network connectivity p-values (Pathways, Biogrid, and string) among the gastrocnemius week-8 multi-omic genes and with the single-omic genes. c) Proportion of features from each ome represented in the gastrocnemius response clusters, identified by the network clustering analysis. d-g) Overlap between our rat vastus lateralis differential expression results and the meta-analysis of human long-term exercise studies by Amar et al. d-e) Spearman correlation (d) and its significance (e) between the meta-analysis fold-changes and the log2 fold-changes foreach sex and time point. f) GSEA results. Genes were ranked by meta-analysis (−log10 p-value*log2 fold-change) and the rat training-differential, sex-consistent gene sets were tested for enrichment at the bottom of the ranking (negative scores) or the top (positive scores). g) Overlap between the rat gene sets from (f) and the high-heterogeneity human meta-analysis genes (I2 > 75%). h) -log10 overlap p-values (Fisher's exact test), comparing rat female gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis week-8 differential transcripts from this study (p < 0.01) and the differential genes from the rat female soleus data of Bye et al. (p < 0.01). HCR: high capacity runners, LCR: low capacity runners. i) A comparison of rat gastrocnemius differential proteins from this study (p < 0.01) and the human endurance training proteomics results of Hostrup et al. (p < 0.01) using Fisher's exact test. Left: -log10 overlap p-values. Right: -log10 sex concordance p-values. j) Statistics of the overlapping proteins from (i), week-8 female comparison (y: rat z-scores, x: human t-scores). k) DOSE disease enrichment results of the white adipose, kidney, and liver gene sets. DOSE was applied only on diseases that are relevant for each tissue. The network shows the results for the sex-consistent down-regulated features at week-8.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Characterization of the extent of sex difference in the endurance training response.

The extent of sex differences in the training response were characterized in two ways: first, by correlating log2 fold-changes between males and females for each training-differential feature; second, by calculating the difference between the area under the log2 fold-change curve for each training-differential feature, including a (0,0) point (ΔAUC, males - females). The first approach characterizes differences in direction of effect while the second approach characterizes differences in magnitude. Left plot for each tissue: density line plots of correlations from the first approach. Densities or correlations corresponding to features in each ome are plotted separately, with a label that provides the ome and the number of differential features represented. Right plot for each tissue: 2D density plot of ΔAUC against the correlation between the male and female log2 fold-changes for each training-differential feature used to simultaneously evaluate sex differences in the direction and magnitude of the training response. Points at the top-center of these 2D density plots represent features with high similarity between males and females in terms of both direction and magnitude; features on the right and left sides of the plots represent features with greater magnitudes of response in males and females, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 11 Sex differences in the endurance training response.

a) Heatmap of the training response of immunoassay analytes across tissues. Gray indicates no data. Bars indicate the number of training-regulated analytes in each tissue (top) and the number of tissues in which the analyte is training-regulated (right, 5% FDR). b) Training-differential cytokines across tissues. 5, 24, and 9 cytokines were annotated as anti-, pro-, and pro/anti- inflammatory, respectively. Bars indicate the number of annotated cytokines in each category that are differential (5% FDR). c) Counts of early vs. (1- or 2-week) vs. late (4- or 8-week) differential cytokines, according to states assigned by the graphical analysis, including all tissues. Cytokines with both early and late responses in the same tissue were excluded. d) Line plots of standardized abundances of training-differential features that follow the largest graphical path in the adrenal gland (i.e., 1w_F-1_M1 − >2w_F-1_M0 − >4w_F-1_M0 − >8w_F-1_M0 according to our graphical analysis notation). The black line represents the average value across all features. The closer a colored line is to this average, the darker it is (distance calculated using sum of squares). e) Line plots of transcript-level log2 fold-changes corresponding to six transcription factors (TFs) whose motifs are significantly enriched by transcripts in (d). TF motif enrichment q-values are provided in the legend (error bars = SEM). f) Male versus female NES from PTM-SEA in the lung. Anticorrelated points corresponding to PRKACA NES are in dark red. g) Line plots of standardized abundances of training-differential phosphosites that follow the largest graphical edges of phosphosites in the lung (1w_F1_M-1 − >2w_F1_M-1 − >4w_F0_M-1). h) Top ten kinases with the greatest over-representation of substrates (proteins) corresponding to training-differential phosphosites in (g). MeanRank scores by library are shown, as reported by KEA3. i) Line plots showing phosphosite-level log2 fold-changes of PRKACA phosphosite substrates identified in the lung as differential with disparate sex responses (error bars = SEM).

Extended Data Fig. 12 Assessment of immune responses to endurance training.

a) Heatmap of the number and percent of KEGG and Reactome immune pathways significantly enriched by training-regulated features at 8 weeks. b) Line plots of standardized abundances of training-differential proteins in white adipose tissue up-regulated only in males at 8 weeks. Black line shows average across all features. c) Boxplots of the sample-level Pearson correlation between markers of immune cell types, lymphatic tissue, or cell proliferation and the average value of features in (b) at the protein level. Center line represents median; box bounds represent 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers represent minimum and maximum excluding outliers; filled dots represent outliers. A pink point indicates that the marker is also one of the differential features plotted in (b). # indicates when the distribution of Pearson correlations for a set of at least two markers is significantly different from 0 (two-sided one-sample t-test, 5% BY FDR). When only one marker is used to define a category on the y-axis, the gene name is provided in parentheses. d) Trajectories of mean absolute signal of various immune cell types in BAT or WAT-SC following deconvolution of bulk RNA-Seq with CIBERSORTx (error bars = SEM). e) Immune cell type enrichment analysis results of training-differentially expressed transcripts. Points represent significant enrichments (5% FDR, one-sided Mann-Whitney U test). f) Line plots showing the log2 fold-changes for Cxcr3 and Il1a transcripts in the small intestine (error bars = SEM).

Extended Data Fig. 13 Metabolic effects of endurance training.

a) Significant enrichments for relevant categories of KEGG metabolism pathways from features that are up- or down- regulated in both sexes at 8 weeks (8w_F1_M1 and 8w_F-1_M-1 nodes, respectively). Triangles point in the direction of the response (up or down). Points are colored by ome. b) Log2 fold-change of metabolites regulated across many tissues (F-Test, 5% FDR, error bars=SEM). c) Log2 fold-change of training-regulated metabolites: 1-methylhistidine in the kidney, cortisol in the kidney, and 1-methylnicotinamide in the liver (F-Test, 5% FDR, error bars = SEM). d) Volcano plots showing abundance changes (log2 fold-changes; logFC) and significance (-log10 nominal p-values) for acyl-carnitines. Features are colored based on the carnitine chain length. e) Protein abundance changes in the glycolysis and gluconeogenesis pathway in the heart tissue after 8 weeks of training. Line plots show the log2 fold-changes over the training time course (error bars = SEM). Red and blue boxes indicate a statistically significant (F-test, 5% FDR) increase and decrease in abundance, respectively, for both males and females at 8 weeks.

Extended Data Fig. 14 Mitochondria and peroxisome adaptations to endurance training.

a) Boxplots showing the percent of mitochondrial genome reads across samples in each tissue that map to the mitochondrial genome (% MT reads). b) Comparison of % MT reads between untrained controls and animals trained for 8 weeks. Plot shows tissues with a statistically significant change after 8 weeks in at least one sex (red asterisk, two-sided Dunnett's test, 10% FDR). For boxplots in (b,c): center line represents median; box bounds represent 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers represent minimum and maximum excluding outliers; filled dots represent outliers. c) Boxplots showing the percent of mitochondrial genome reads across tissue, sex, and time points. Center line represents median; box bounds represent 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers represent minimum and maximum excluding outliers; open circles represent outliers. Red asterisks indicate a significant change throughout the training time course (F-test, 5% FDR). Center line represents median; box bounds represent 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers represent minimum and maximum excluding outliers; blue dots represent outliers. d) GSEA using the MitoCarta MitoPathways gene set database and transcriptome (TRNSCRPT) or phosphoproteome (PHOSPHO) differential analysis results. NES are shown for significant pathways (10% FDR) for all tissues, sexes, and time points within the heatmap. Mitochondria pathways (rows) are grouped using the parental group in the MitoPathways hierarchy. e) Protein abundance and protein acetylation level changes in the peroxisome KEGG pathway in the liver tissue after 8 weeks of training. Red boxes indicate an increase in abundance for both males and females, while red circles indicate an increase in at least one acetylsite within the protein (8w_F1_M1 cluster).

Supplementary information

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MoTrPAC Study Group., Lead Analysts. & MoTrPAC Study Group. Temporal dynamics of the multi-omic response to endurance exercise training. Nature 629, 174-183 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06877-w

Download citation

< Back to 68k.news US front page